The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is the primary regulator for the conduct of individuals and companies who operate in the Financial Services sector. That sector is now enormous. It encompasses the provisions of ‘vanilla’ financial services to the consumer (traditional high street banking – accounts, mortgages), to share trading by individuals and investment banks (buying and selling of shares/options/futures on FTSE100 and AIM and any other regulated market), to loans under the Consumer Credit Act (car financing loans) and the murky world of binary options.
In accordance with the breadth of the sector, the FCA’s enforcement activity now ranges from investigating criminal conduct:
and regulatory breaches of:
The FCA derives its power to regulate from the Financial Services & Markets Act 2000 (‘FSMA’). FSMA gives significant powers to the FCA’s Enforcement & Market Oversight Division (‘EMO’) to open enforcement investigations. FSMA provides the FCA with a considerable suite of information gathering powers such as the power to compel information and also seize it.
The FCA is also unusual in that although it is a UK government agency it is also a limited company and funded through subscription by the financial services industry.
The combination of a power to compel and a proper budget for enforcement investigations make EMO a formidable force: it is methodical, thorough and certainly not speedy.
All EMO enforcement investigations are now opened on a ‘dual-track’ basis. A dual track investigation is one where the conduct is viewed in the context of a potential regulatory breach and suspected commission of a criminal offence.
When FCA enforcement investigators are appointed to look at an individual or company’s conduct they do so with the ability to use all the powers available in FSMA (s167 -168). Those powers included the power to compel information (s171-175) and apply for criminal search warrants (s176).
The power to compel information (s171-175) in the form of answers to questions but also in the supply of physical documents is not to be underestimated. The power can be exercised not only in relation to the subject of the investigation but also any other party who may hold information that is relevant. Only the Serious Fraud Office has a similar power (s2 Criminal Justice Act 1987).
Non-compliance with a compelled request can result in prosecution (s177) and the FCA has shown a willingness to pursue such action: Konstantin Vishnyak was under investigation by the FCA for suspected insider dealing offences and the FCA allege that he deleted a WhatsApp application on his mobile phone after he was required to provide it as part of the investigation.
Jeremy Gordon’s approach to FCA enforcement investigations is holistic. It will often be unclear whether EMO will pursue a criminal or civil sanction and as outlined above such a decision can be deferred for a considerable period.
Individuals and companies need to be prepared equally for argument in the criminal courts and in front of the Regulatory Decisions Committee (the FCA’s own internal committee that is the arbiter of whether a civil financial penalty requested by EMO is fair).
Jeremy Gordon has substantial experience of successfully guiding subjects of FCA enforcement investigations through what is a long and stressful process. That ability to achieve a successful outcome for clients is enhanced by the experience of the head of the firm’s Financial Services regulatory team as a former FCA enforcement lawyer.
Contact London +44 7700 158304 or Manchester +44 7700 164107. Alternatively you can email info@jeremygordon.co.uk
The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) play distinct but interconnected roles in regulati...
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK is proactively enforcing the perimeter by urging firms to review and, if necessary, remove unused re...
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) recently issued a “Reasons for Trading Letter” and launched a “Preliminary Review of Trading...
As of 8th October 2023, all cryptoasset firms marketing to UK consumers must comply with the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) financial promo...
Transcript of The Which? Money Podcast featuring Tim Thompson . Speaker 1 Welcome to the Which? Money podcast. Your weekly hits of money, news and person...
Regulatory investigations can be a daunting experience for businesses and individuals alike. The consequences of non-compliance can be severe, with fi...
In the United Kingdom, the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) regulates financial markets and services. As part of its enforcement powers,...
The takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS has more than a flavour of the Lloyds Bank Group ‘shot-gun wedding’ with HBOS in 2009: one financial services...
Insider dealing is a serious charge, one that comes with considerable consequences if an individual is found guilty. It’s a complex area of law whic...
What is a Cifas marker? CIFAS stands for ‘Credit Industry Fraud Avoidance System‘, a not-for-profit fraud prevention membership organisation. It o...
National Fraud Database CIFAS fraud markers are adverse judgements through which one institution, be it a bank, loan company or an insurer, for exampl...
Following the release of the judgment in PCP and Barclays, one of our directors, Tim Thompson , spoke to Bloomberg about the potential repercussions for ...
The FinCEN leak will surprise no experienced lawyers advising UHNWIs (Ultra-High Net Worth Individuals) and their professional advisers. The irony o...
The recent announcement by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) of guidance for companies in the medicinal cannabis sector, thinking about listing on...
Furlough fraud claims are on the rise. Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC) together with whistleblowing organisations are reporting thousan...