CIFAS stands for ‘Credit Industry Fraud Avoidance System‘, a not-for-profit fraud prevention membership organisation.
It operates as a fraud prevention service, and manages the largest database of fraudulent conduct instances in the UK.
Membership of the organisation encompasses a wide range of sectors, with members sharing their data with the aim of reducing fraud and crime.
Most financial institutions are members of the CIFAS, and through it they share large amounts of data about companies and individuals.
CIFAS markers are adverse judgements through which one institution, be it a bank, loan company or an insurer, for example, can warn another about risks associated with a potential customer.
The most common markers that are placed on an individual’s file are for ‘First Party Fraud’ and ‘Application Fraud’.
Having a CIFAS marker means that any application for credit, or other financial services from the address, may be subject to further checks.
It can present particular problems when you apply for credit, which is checked automatically, such as store finance. As the entry would need to be manually checked, an automated system is likely to reject your application.
A Cifas Marker, or Cifas Entry, is made on the CIFAS National Fraud Database as a potential fraud warning.
It’s visible to prospective lenders, and makes them aware you may be vulnerable to fraudulent attempts to take out credit in your name.
They act as adverse judgements through which one institution that offers financial services, such as a bank, insurer, or loan company, can warn another about potential risks associated with a customer.
The two most common markers that are placed on an individual’s file are for ‘First Party Fraud’ and ‘Application Fraud.’
Having a Cifas marker on your credit report is likely to mean any application for financial services or credit may be subject to further checks, if not outright refusal.
Cifas stands for ‘Credit Industry Fraud Avoidance System,’ a not-for-profit fraud prevention membership organisation. It operates as a fraud prevention service, and manages the largest database of fraudulent conduct instances in the UK.
Membership of the organisation encompasses a wide range of sectors, with members sharing their data with the aim of reducing fraud and crime.
Most financial institutions are members of the CIFAS, and through it they share large amounts of data about companies and individuals.
If you have been a victim of fraud, you will find this recorded on your credit report.
This type of Cifas marker is known as a Victim of Impersonation entry, and is usually filed by a lender for your own protection, often as a result of identity fraud.
This is the least serious form of Cifas marker from the point of view of potential lenders.
It will usually remain visible on your report for 13 months.
Another marker type is protective registration.
This is a purchased service that individuals can request when they believe they have been the victim of identity fraud. It appears for two years from the date you purchased the service.
The remaining six categories of Cifas markers will not appear on your credit report and can only be revealed by making a Data Subject Access Request (DSAR).
A Data Subject Access Request is an application made directly to Cifas via an online application form.
By doing so, an applicant can find out the details of the marker(s) held on its database.
This is often a relatively small amount of information, and the institution that supplied it is not required to provide the evidence this was based on.
The range of markers that might appear on your credit report are:
Once you have been supplied with a letter detailing the nature of the Cifas marker(s), you can contact the particular institution(s) that added it to your account and request an explanation for the reasons why using a Data Subject Access Request (DSAR).
You can then ask for the marker to be removed.
It’s possible the institution will refuse.
If it is unwilling to engage with you request and its decision is final, it will issue a final response letter.
When you are in receipt of a final response letter, you can then request a review directly from Cifas, which is required to adjudicate within 14 days.
If Cifas upholds the institution’s decision, it’s possible to appeal with the relevant industry ombudsman for the particular institution responsible for your marker.
If an appeal to the ombudsman is also rejected, then in certain limited circumstances it might be possible to challenge the decision through judicial review or an injunction.
If you are having problems accessing credit, or entering into contracts for goods and services, it may be appropriate to make a Cifas data subject access request.
This could give you the information you need to rectify any issue you are having with accessing credit.
If you are attempting to enter into a large financial agreement, such as a mortgage, and you suspect you have a Cifas marker, you should access your report prior to making an application.
Should an application for a mortgage, or other substantial loan, be turned down it will be entered onto your credit report.
This can have a detrimental effect on your ability to access alternative credit sources.
If you are having repeated problems gaining credit, then you should try to obtain as full a picture of your credit report as possible before making any more applications.
This could include making a Cifas data subject access request.
The experienced team at Jeremy Gordon can provide advice and guidance about Cifas markers and how you might remove them from your credit report.
Contact London +44 7700 158304 or Manchester +44 7700 164107. For out of hours enquires please contact Tim Thompsonon 07593 559 393.
Alternatively you can also email info@jeremygordon.co.uk
The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) play distinct but interconnected roles in regulati...
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK is proactively enforcing the perimeter by urging firms to review and, if necessary, remove unused re...
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) recently issued a “Reasons for Trading Letter” and launched a “Preliminary Review of Trading...
As of 8th October 2023, all cryptoasset firms marketing to UK consumers must comply with the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) financial promo...
Transcript of The Which? Money Podcast featuring Tim Thompson . Speaker 1 Welcome to the Which? Money podcast. Your weekly hits of money, news and person...
Regulatory investigations can be a daunting experience for businesses and individuals alike. The consequences of non-compliance can be severe, with fi...
In the United Kingdom, the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) regulates financial markets and services. As part of its enforcement powers,...
The takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS has more than a flavour of the Lloyds Bank Group ‘shot-gun wedding’ with HBOS in 2009: one financial services...
Insider dealing is a serious charge, one that comes with considerable consequences if an individual is found guilty. It’s a complex area of law whic...
National Fraud Database CIFAS fraud markers are adverse judgements through which one institution, be it a bank, loan company or an insurer, for exampl...
Following the release of the judgment in PCP and Barclays, one of our directors, Tim Thompson , spoke to Bloomberg about the potential repercussions for ...
The FinCEN leak will surprise no experienced lawyers advising UHNWIs (Ultra-High Net Worth Individuals) and their professional advisers. The irony o...
The recent announcement by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) of guidance for companies in the medicinal cannabis sector, thinking about listing on...
Furlough fraud claims are on the rise. Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC) together with whistleblowing organisations are reporting thousan...