The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) recently issued a “Reasons for Trading Letter” and launched a “Preliminary Review of Trading” focused on specific market activities. This raises questions: what prompted these actions, and what potential outcomes can we expect?
Understanding the “Reasons for Trading Letter”:
This letter originates from the FCA’s concerns about potential market abuse risks associated with certain trading activities. It serves as a formal notice to firms and individuals suspected of engaging in practices that could manipulate or disrupt markets. The letter outlines the specific concerns and requests relevant information to assess the validity of those suspicions. This could involve details about trading positions, communication logs, and algorithmic strategies.
Reasons for the FCA’s Preliminary Review of Trading:
The FCA’s preliminary review delves deeper into specific aspects of the market to identify potential systemic issues and assess their impact on investors and market integrity. This proactive approach allows the FCA to gather early-stage insights and determine whether further regulatory action is needed. Key areas of focus could include:
Potential Outcomes:
The outcomes of these actions depend on the findings of the investigations. Here are some possibilities:
Impact on Market Participants:
These actions raise significant awareness for market participants:
The FCA’s “Reasons for Trading Letter” and “Preliminary Review of Trading” highlight the regulator’s commitment to addressing potential market abuse risks and safeguarding market integrity. Understanding the reasons behind these actions and their potential outcomes empowers market participants to adapt their practices and contribute to a fair and efficient financial system.
The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) play distinct but interconnected roles in regulati...
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK is proactively enforcing the perimeter by urging firms to review and, if necessary, remove unused re...
As of 8th October 2023, all cryptoasset firms marketing to UK consumers must comply with the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) financial promo...
Transcript of The Which? Money Podcast featuring Tim Thompson . Speaker 1 Welcome to the Which? Money podcast. Your weekly hits of money, news and person...
Regulatory investigations can be a daunting experience for businesses and individuals alike. The consequences of non-compliance can be severe, with fi...
In the United Kingdom, the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) regulates financial markets and services. As part of its enforcement powers,...
The takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS has more than a flavour of the Lloyds Bank Group ‘shot-gun wedding’ with HBOS in 2009: one financial services...
Insider dealing is a serious charge, one that comes with considerable consequences if an individual is found guilty. It’s a complex area of law whic...
What is a Cifas marker? CIFAS stands for ‘Credit Industry Fraud Avoidance System‘, a not-for-profit fraud prevention membership organisation. It o...
National Fraud Database CIFAS fraud markers are adverse judgements through which one institution, be it a bank, loan company or an insurer, for exampl...
Following the release of the judgment in PCP and Barclays, one of our directors, Tim Thompson , spoke to Bloomberg about the potential repercussions for ...
The FinCEN leak will surprise no experienced lawyers advising UHNWIs (Ultra-High Net Worth Individuals) and their professional advisers. The irony o...
The recent announcement by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) of guidance for companies in the medicinal cannabis sector, thinking about listing on...
Furlough fraud claims are on the rise. Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC) together with whistleblowing organisations are reporting thousan...